SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission (US)
SEC proposes simplified public company filer-status framework and expanded reporting accommodations
Published
May 19, 2026
Topics
Public company reporting, Filer status, Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Internal control over financial reporting, Smaller reporting companies, Emerging growth companies, Disclosure simplification
Executive Summary
The SEC has proposed a major restructuring of the public company reporting framework. The proposal would simplify Exchange Act filer status into two primary categories: large accelerated filers and non-accelerated filers. The large accelerated filer threshold would rise from $700 million to $2 billion in public float, with a new public-float measurement method and a longer seasoning period before newly public companies could become large accelerated filers. Companies that are not large accelerated filers would be treated as non-accelerated filers and would generally receive scaled disclosure accommodations currently associated with smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies, including relief from the auditor attestation requirement for internal control over financial reporting. The SEC also proposes extended Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filing deadlines for the smallest non-accelerated filers, measured by total assets. This is a proposal, not a final rule, so there is no immediate compliance change. However, issuers should assess whether they would move between filer categories and consider submitting comments by July 20, 2026.
What Changed
Previous
Large accelerated filer status generally applies at $700 million or more in public float, measured as of the last business day of the most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
New
Proposed: large accelerated filer status would apply at $2 billion or more in public float, measured using the average stock price over the last 10 trading days of the second fiscal quarter and requiring the threshold to be met for two consecutive years.
Previous
A registrant can become a large accelerated filer after being subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements for at least 12 calendar months and filing at least one annual report, if other conditions are met.
New
Proposed: an issuer would remain a non-accelerated filer until it has been subject to Exchange Act Section 13(a) or 15(d) reporting for at least 60 consecutive calendar months, if other large accelerated filer conditions are later met.
Previous
Non-accelerated filer is widely used for companies that are neither accelerated filers nor large accelerated filers, but the term is not currently defined in the rules.
New
Proposed: non-accelerated filer would mean an issuer that is not a large accelerated filer. Accelerated filer and smaller reporting company statuses would be eliminated as unnecessary under the proposed framework.
Previous
Scaled disclosure accommodations depend on overlapping smaller reporting company and emerging growth company status, and large accelerated filers and accelerated filers are generally subject to auditor attestation of management’s ICFR assessment unless another exemption applies.
New
Proposed: non-accelerated filers would generally receive scaled disclosure accommodations and would not be required to obtain ICFR auditor attestation under Section 404(b); large accelerated filers would continue to follow non-scaled disclosure requirements.
Previous
Non-accelerated filers currently have Form 10-K and Form 10-Q deadlines of 90 days and 45 days after period end, respectively.
New
Proposed: non-accelerated filers with total assets of $35 million or less as of the end of each of their two most recent second fiscal quarters would be eligible for extended periodic-report filing deadlines.
Business Impact
Who is affected
Directly affected
Exchange Act reporting companies that determine large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company status, including companies filing Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 20-F and certain registration statements identified in the proposal.
Indirectly affected
audit firms, disclosure counsel, investor relations teams, board audit and compensation committees, investors, financial printers, EDGAR filing agents, and reporting software providers.
Jurisdictions
United States
Business processes
Annual filer-status determination, Public-float and affiliate-share calculations, Periodic reporting calendar management, Form 10-K and Form 10-Q preparation, Scaled Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X disclosure scoping, ICFR auditor-attestation planning, Disclosure committee and board reporting, SEC comment-letter monitoring
Estimated effort
Medium
Compliance risk
Medium
Affected Reports
| Field | Validation rule |
|---|---|
| Large accelerated filer status threshold | Proposed amendments to Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 would raise the public-float threshold from $700 million to $2 billion. |
| Public-float calculation methodology | Proposed Rule 12b-2 amendments would use the average stock price over the last 10 trading days of the second fiscal quarter and the number of non-affiliate shares as of the last day of that quarter. |
| Two-year transition test | Proposed Rule 12b-2 amendments would require public float to remain above or below the large accelerated filer threshold for two consecutive years before a filer-status transition. |
| Seasoning requirement | Proposed Rule 12b-2 amendments would require at least 60 consecutive calendar months of Exchange Act Section 13(a) or 15(d) reporting before large accelerated filer status can attach. |
| Non-accelerated filer definition | Proposed amendments would define non-accelerated filer as an issuer that is not a large accelerated filer. |
| ICFR auditor attestation applicability | Proposed amendments would extend non-accelerated filer relief so that non-accelerated filers would not be required to obtain auditor attestation of management’s ICFR assessment under Section 404(b). |
| Scaled disclosure scope | Proposed amendments to Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X would extend current smaller reporting company and certain emerging growth company accommodations to non-accelerated filers. |
| Small non-accelerated filer asset test | Proposed amendments would create a smallest non-accelerated filer sub-category for issuers with total assets of $35 million or less as of the end of each of the two most recent second fiscal quarters. |
| Material unresolved SEC staff comments disclosure | Proposed Form 10-K and Form 20-F amendments would extend to non-accelerated filers the requirement to disclose material unresolved staff comments received at least 180 days before fiscal year end. |
Recommended Actions
- 1AI generatedStep 1 of 7
prepare a side-by-side current-versus-proposed filer-status assessment using the proposed $2 billion public-float threshold, 10-trading-day average, two-year transition test, and 60-month seasoning period.
- 2AI generatedStep 2 of 7
identify which scaled Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X disclosures would become available if the company would be a non-accelerated filer under the proposal, and assess investor-relations and governance implications before reducing disclosure.
- 3AI generatedStep 3 of 7
reassess SOX 404(b) audit planning scenarios, including whether the company would discontinue, continue voluntarily, or phase down ICFR auditor attestation if the proposal is finalized as drafted.
- 4AI generatedStep 4 of 7
review Form 10-K and Form 10-Q production calendars, especially for issuers that may qualify as smallest non-accelerated filers, while avoiding operational changes until a final rule establishes effective and compliance dates.
- 5AI generatedStep 5 of 7
update disclosure committee materials to track the proposed Form 10-K/Form 20-F unresolved SEC staff-comment disclosure requirement for non-accelerated filers.
- 6AI generatedStep 6 of 7
coordinate finance, legal, audit, compensation, and investor-relations teams on whether the company should submit a comment letter by July 20, 2026.
- 7AI generatedStep 7 of 7
monitor the final rulemaking and any related SEC form instructions, EDGAR updates, filing manuals, or compliance guidance before amending formal reporting policies.
Timeline
consultation deadline
Jul 20, 2026
Deadline for the SEC to receive comments on proposed rule File No. S7-2026-18.
Sources
AI-generated analysis is based on the following primary sources. Always verify against the official publication.
- Proposed ruleU.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionDate not specifiedEnhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies, Release Nos. 33-11419; 34-105515; File No. S7-2026-18 ↗
https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/proposed/2026/33-11419.pdf
Related Evidence
Verified source support for this analysis
The evidence agent checks whether the drafted finding is supported by official publications and relevant public source material.
Receive updates like this by email
Get AI-generated analysis for the regulators and topics you care about.